Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

▲Reply to this •••+ My feed React Follow

100% 是的	0% 不
86% 是的	0% 不
14% Yes, but not for cosmetics

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Animal Testing” has changed over time for 7 Taiwan voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart...

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Animal Testing” has changed over time for 7 Taiwan voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart...

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to Taiwan voters.

@ISIDEWITH asked…11yrs11Y

政府应该增加对精神健康研究和治疗的资金投入吗？

@ISIDEWITH asked…11yrs11Y

政府应该提高对富人的税收？. 澳大利亚目前有累进税制度，使高收入者缴纳的税比低所得税的比例较高。更累进所得税制度已被提议作为对减少贫富差距的工具。

澳大利亚目前有累进税制度，使高收入者缴纳的税比低所得税的比例较高。更累进所得税制度已被提议作为对减少贫富差距的工具。

▲ 3

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

候选人

About

Taiwan 讲中文

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

电子邮件推特 Facebook的 YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.