Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
21% Yes |
79% No |
21% Yes |
50% No |
0% Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease |
18% No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
0% Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process |
11% No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
See how support for each position on “Muslim Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 28 Taiwan voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Muslim Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 28 Taiwan voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Taiwan users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@98PCQJ81yr1Y
Ban especially these who used drugs. I observe that muslims who had ever used marijuana are bigger threat to society than people who had never used it.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Muslim Immigrant Ban” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to Taiwan voters.
